Comparative Study of Text Editors for Scientific Paper Writing with Mathematical Notation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.57119/litdig.v2i2.111Keywords:
Microsoft Word, LaTeX, Scientific writing, Mathematical notation, Text editorAbstract
Writing scientific papers that include complex mathematical notation requires specialized text editors. This study provides a comprehensive review of various text editors, evaluating their effectiveness for tasks involving mathematical notation. The comparison includes freeware and paid software such as OpenOffice, LibreOffice, Microsoft Word, TeXmacs, and Overleaf, examining aspects like file formats, file size, installation process, learning curve, collaboration ease, and output formats. Through a detailed analysis of existing literature, the study highlights the strengths and weaknesses of each editor, with a particular focus on LaTeX's precision and versatility. The findings suggest that LaTeX is the preferred choice for its high-quality output, while Overleaf offers significant advantages for collaborative projects. Freeware options like GNU TeXmacs and LibreOffice are also viable alternatives, each with unique benefits. The study concludes with recommendations on choosing the appropriate text editor based on specific project requirements and user preferences.
Downloads
References
A. Goldberg, M. Russell, and A. Cook, “A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Word Processing on Writing Quality,” Review of Educational Research, 2003. DOI: 10.3102/0034654307309948
M. Knauff and J. Nejasmic, “An Efficiency Comparison of Document Preparation Systems Used in Academic Research and Development,” PLOS ONE, vol. 9, no. 12, pp. e115069, 2014. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115069
K. P. Sanjailal, “LATEX: A high quality document preparation system for scientific and technical literature,” 2012. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.1401.2472
M. Borenstein, L. V. Hedges, J. P. T. Higgins, and H. R. Rothstein, Introduction to Meta-Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, 2009. DOI: 10.1002/9780470743386
D. R. Matthews, “Craft beautiful equations in Word with LaTeX,” Nature, 2019. DOI: 10.1038/D41586-019-01796-1
B. Salzberg and T. Murphy, “LaTeX: when word fails you,” in SIGUCCS: User Services Conference, 2005. DOI: 10.1145/1099435.1099490
Y. Zheng, “Academic Writing by Using Latex: A Hands-on Workshop,” ACM SIGUCCS Conference, 2023. DOI: 10.1145/3585059.3611425
S. Jun, X. Heng, Z. Chaoqun, P. Yan, C. Wei, and W. Yadi, “Method and system for converting Word document into LaTeX document,” 2019. DOI: 10.31730/osf.io/43xmw
R. C. DeVries, J. C. Deitz, and D. Anson, “A comparison of two computer access systems for functional text entry,” American Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 52, no. 8, pp. 656-662, 1998. DOI: 10.5014/AJOT.52.8.656
D. Chen and C. Sun, “Comparison of real-time text chat and collaborative editing systems,” Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2004. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-27777-4_3
J. Becker, C. Janiesch, D. Pfeiffer, T. Rieke, and A. Winkelmann, “Studie: Verteilte Publikationserstellung mit Microsoft Word und den Microsoft SharePoint Services,” Research Papers in Economics, 2004. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.606061
M. J. Baker, Scientific Writing: A Guide for Researchers, Springer, 2013. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-40501-3
E. J. Wegman, “Writing for Impact: How to Craft Papers that Communicate,” IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 196-202, 2001. DOI: 10.1109/5992.964430
E. Lund and A. Lund, “The Effect of Video Tutorials on Student Learning in Higher Education,” Nature, vol. 586, pp. 224-227, 2020. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2242-2
B. McCulloch, “Enhancing the Learning Experience with Interactive Tutorials,” IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 70-79, 2011. DOI: 10.1109/MCSE.2011.37
H. Thimbleby, “Improving the Usability of Spreadsheet Tools,” ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1-32, 2000. DOI: 10.1145/345506.345607
L. S. Prokopy, “The Role of Community in Overcoming Barriers to Adoption of Sustainable Practices,” Agricultural Systems, vol. 117, pp. 63-71, 2013. DOI: 10.1007/s11119-013-9306-4
A. Chamberlain, “Enhancing Scientific Communication through Effective Writing,” Nature Communications, vol. 5, p. 5321, 2014. DOI: 10.1038/nature13995
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Edy Wihardjo, Arif Fatahillah, Saddam Hussen, Lioni Anka Monalisa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
